Whatcha looking at!?, ...malo razbijanja mitova
doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women
Heather A. Ruppa, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Kim Wallena
aDepartment of Psychology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
bThe Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Morrison Hall 313, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Received 14 October 2006; revised 27 January 2007; accepted 30 January 2007. Available online 12 February 2007.
Abstract
Men and women exhibit different neural, genital, and subjective arousal responses to visual sexual stimuli. The source of these sex differences is unknown. We hypothesized that men and women look differently at sexual stimuli, resulting in different responses. We used eye tracking to measure looking by 15 male and 30 female (15 normal cycling (NC) and 15 oral contracepting (OC)) heterosexual adults viewing sexually explicit photos. NC Women were tested during their menstrual, periovulatory, and luteal phases while Men and OC Women were tested at equivalent intervals, producing three test sessions per individual. Men, NC, and OC Women differed in the relative amounts of first looks towards, percent time looking at, and probability of looking at, defined regions of the pictures. Men spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at female faces. NC Women had more first looks towards, spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at genitals. OC Women spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at contextual regions of pictures, those featuring clothing or background. Groups did not differ in looking at the female body. Menstrual cycle phase did not affect women's looking patterns. However, differences between OC and NC groups suggest hormonal influences on attention to sexual stimuli that were unexplained by subject characteristic differences. Our finding that men and women attend to different aspects of the same visual sexual stimuli could reflect pre-existing cognitive biases that possibly contribute to sex differences in neural, subjective, and physiological arousal.
Keywords: Sexual stimuli; Sex differences; Eye tracking; Oral contraceptives
Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Morrison Hall 313, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Fax: +1 812 855 8277.
Hormones and Behavior
Volume 51, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages 524-533
---------------------------------
Znači, tesne pantalone...
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women
Heather A. Ruppa, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Kim Wallena
aDepartment of Psychology and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
bThe Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Morrison Hall 313, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
Received 14 October 2006; revised 27 January 2007; accepted 30 January 2007. Available online 12 February 2007.
Abstract
Men and women exhibit different neural, genital, and subjective arousal responses to visual sexual stimuli. The source of these sex differences is unknown. We hypothesized that men and women look differently at sexual stimuli, resulting in different responses. We used eye tracking to measure looking by 15 male and 30 female (15 normal cycling (NC) and 15 oral contracepting (OC)) heterosexual adults viewing sexually explicit photos. NC Women were tested during their menstrual, periovulatory, and luteal phases while Men and OC Women were tested at equivalent intervals, producing three test sessions per individual. Men, NC, and OC Women differed in the relative amounts of first looks towards, percent time looking at, and probability of looking at, defined regions of the pictures. Men spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at female faces. NC Women had more first looks towards, spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at genitals. OC Women spent more time, and had a higher probability of, looking at contextual regions of pictures, those featuring clothing or background. Groups did not differ in looking at the female body. Menstrual cycle phase did not affect women's looking patterns. However, differences between OC and NC groups suggest hormonal influences on attention to sexual stimuli that were unexplained by subject characteristic differences. Our finding that men and women attend to different aspects of the same visual sexual stimuli could reflect pre-existing cognitive biases that possibly contribute to sex differences in neural, subjective, and physiological arousal.
Keywords: Sexual stimuli; Sex differences; Eye tracking; Oral contraceptives
Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction, Indiana University, Morrison Hall 313, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Fax: +1 812 855 8277.
Hormones and Behavior
Volume 51, Issue 4, April 2007, Pages 524-533
---------------------------------
Znači, tesne pantalone...
Komentari:
Super tekst...samo, sada sam u dilemi...da li svaki pol gleda ono sto je njemu najvaznije...ili ono sto misli da je najvrednije sto suprotni pol ima da ponudi...hmmmm... :))))
Poslao
Lilith
u 09:54, 18/4/2007 | Link | |
vidim da nekome sljakaju hormoni...
Poslao
Anoniman
u 14:33, 18/4/2007 | Link | |
jašta, što tesnije... :)
Poslao
mazzapsycho
u 18:24, 18/4/2007 | Link | |
